A call for a “national divorce” threatens to further divide America, sparking intense debate among lawmakers and citizens alike.
Story Highlights
- Marjorie Taylor Greene advocates for a “national divorce” following activist’s death.
- The proposal echoes historical secessionist rhetoric, raising constitutional concerns.
- Democratic leaders condemn the violence and urge unity amid rising tensions.
- The call remains rhetorical with no formal policy action taken.
Greene’s Call for Separation
In response to the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) has reignited her controversial call for a “national divorce” between conservative and liberal Americans. Greene argues that the nation is irreparably divided, making peaceful coexistence impossible. Her statements, made on social media, advocate for a formal separation between political factions, reflecting a belief that the U.S. is no longer governable as a unified nation.
This divisive proposal follows the tragic death of Kirk, allegedly at the hands of Tyler Robinson, and has sparked intense debate. Democratic leaders, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Vice President Kamala Harris, have condemned the violence and called for unity. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer warned of the dangers of political violence in a recent Senate address, emphasizing the need to preserve democratic norms.
Marjorie Taylor Greene Calls For United States to Be Split Up, Declares Country 'No Longer Safe' For Anyone https://t.co/rGsentv2Cf
— Mediaite (@Mediaite) September 15, 2025
Constitutional and Historical Context
The idea of a “national divorce” draws on historical precedents such as the American Civil War, where deep-seated ideological divisions led to conflict. This rhetoric has gained traction amid escalating political polarization in the U.S. over the past decade, with incidents like the January 6 Capitol riot highlighting the potential for violence. Greene’s call represents a rare and extreme proposal from a sitting member of Congress, emphasizing spiritual revival and distrust in government institutions.
While Greene’s comments have found some support among conservative factions, mainstream commentators and experts warn that this rhetoric undermines democratic norms and increases the risk of further violence. Legal scholars note that formal secession is unconstitutional and would face significant legal barriers. Political scientists emphasize the importance of dialogue and unity to address the nation’s challenges.
Implications and Reactions
The call for a “national divorce” has heightened polarization and security concerns for political activists and public figures. While the proposal remains rhetorical, the debate over political violence and national unity continues to intensify. Experts caution against the normalization of secessionist rhetoric, which could erode trust in democratic institutions and lead to further fragmentation.
Despite the divisive nature of Greene’s proposal, it serves as a stark reminder of the deepening partisan divides in the U.S. The ongoing investigation into Kirk’s death and the reactions from both sides highlight the challenges facing American democracy in a polarized era. The need for dialogue, restraint, and a commitment to democratic principles remains critical as the nation navigates these turbulent times.
Sources:
Marjorie Taylor Greene Calls For United States to Be Split Up
